Legal Opinion

Caminol Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 23, 1941No. Nos. 275-B, 276-B, 7923-B, 6-B, 786-B, 394-B, 395-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUMONT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring these actions to recover taxes collected by the United States under authority of Section 731 of the Revenue Act of 1932, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 636, on the transportation of crude petroleum by pipe line. Each plaintiff was the owner of the oil transported by such plaintiff, and of the pipe lines so transporting it. The suits were tried together, there being an identity of issues in all the actions. Actions numbered 275 and 276 were consolidated, as were those numbered 394 and 395.

Section 731 of the Revenue Act of 1932 by subsection (a) (1)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Louisiana v. McAdooSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Alexander v. Cosden Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Houston v. St. Louis Independent Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Jones v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API