Legal Opinion

Continental Oil Co. v. Jones

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 3859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROADDUS, District Judge.

Parties and Jurisdiction

1. The Continental Oil Company, a Delaware corporation, brings this action against H. C. Jones, a resident of the Western District of Oklahoma, as Collector of Internal Revenue within Oklahoma, for refund of taxes assessed under the provisions of 26 U.S.C.A. § 3460, and paid by the plaintiff corporation. This court has jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(1), (5).1

The Taxed Pipe Line Movement

2. Continental owns and operates certain oil properties in the Ville Platte and Tepetate oil fields of Louisiana. In the year 1936, in the course of development…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Helvering v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. American Chicle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Alexander v. Cosden Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long Corp. v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  2. Matter of HaffnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  3. Boy Scouts of America, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Long Corp. v. District Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  5. Rambacher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API