Legal Opinion

Jones v. Continental Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1944No. 2832PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

The appellee, Continental Oil Company, sued and recovered a judgment against the United States for excise taxes assessed and collected on the movement of crude oil by pipe-line under the provisions of Section 731 of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 169, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 636, which imposes a tax equivalent to 4% of the amount paid for all transportation of crude petroleum or the liquid products thereof by pipe-line; provided that if no charge is made, either by reason of the ownership of the commodity transported, or for any other reason, a tax equivalent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Cosden Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Dixie Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
  3. Motter v. Derby Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. McKeever v. FontenotCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Alexander v. Carter Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Getchell Mine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API