State v. Missouri
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
This Court granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision reversing the trial court, which held that Petitioner Victor Missouri (Missouri) did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in another’s apartment and therefore could not challenge the search of the apartment under the Fourth Amendment. We reverse.
Factual/Procedural Background
In early 1995, Greenville detectives were investigating a crack-cocaine ring. The police obtained a warrant to search the apartment of Curtis and Laura Sibert (Siberts) for cocaine. Missouri was in the apartment at the time,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- State v. KinlochSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.