Legal Opinion
Cohoes Realty Associates v. Lexington Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenberger, J.
Plaintiff Cohoes Realty Associates (Cohoes) is the owner of a real estate complex consisting of several buildings, one of which was a vacant factory (Mill No. 2). Plaintiff Lana Realty Co. is the holder of the mortgage on the property. Cohoes and Lana were coinsured under a one-year, all-risk property insurance policy (the Policy) issued by defendant Lexington Insurance Co. (Lexington), effective October 31, 1994. Defendant and third-party plaintiff Marshall & Sterling Upstate Inc. (M&S), a retail insurance broker, obtained the Policy on behalf of Co-hoes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oppenheimer v. WestcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of HoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Furman v. . FurmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Graney Development Corp. v. TaksenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Peterson v. MelchionaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. New Hampshire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Goodman v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- 101 Maiden Lane Realty Co. v. Tran Han HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Weadick v. HerlihyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Yao-Hung Chang v. SDI International Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005