Legal Opinion

Chase Manhattan Bank v. New Hampshire Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira Gammerman, J.

Introduction

This action involves a dispute over two insurance policies issued in connection with what is known as insurance-backed gap financing of film production. The Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) provided funding to George Litto Pictures, Inc. (GLP), an entity established by producer George Litto, in two facilities: a $7.5 million working capital facility insured by a contingent extra expense policy, and an $89 million facility to fund the production of individual films. One film, “The Crew,” was produced, insured by a cash flow policy, providing…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chase Manhattan Bank v. New Hampshire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. 40 Gardenville, LLC v. Travelers Property Casualty of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
  3. MBIA Insurance v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004
  4. Goodman v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API