Chase Manhattan Bank v. New Hampshire Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ira Gammerman, J.
Introduction
This action involves a dispute over two insurance policies issued in connection with what is known as insurance-backed gap financing of film production. The Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) provided funding to George Litto Pictures, Inc. (GLP), an entity established by producer George Litto, in two facilities: a $7.5 million working capital facility insured by a contingent extra expense policy, and an $89 million facility to fund the production of individual films. One film, “The Crew,” was produced, insured by a cash flow policy, providing…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. New Hampshire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- 40 Gardenville, LLC v. Travelers Property Casualty of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- MBIA Insurance v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004
- Goodman v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.