Legal Opinion
Rudden v. Gro-Plant Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 29, 1973No. [No. 293, September Term, 1972.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
The appellant (Rudden) urges us to set at naught an order of the trial judge, Gaboon, J., denying his motion to quash the writ of fieri facias issued upon the order of the appellee (Gro-Plant). Before we say why we shall affirm Judge Cahoon a curious set of facts must be related.
On 18 June 1970 Gro-Plant filed, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, its declaration, affidavit, notice to plead and a motion for summary judgment against Rudden claiming $1,807.25. The declaration is limited to two common counts — for goods bargained and sold and for money due on accounts stated between them.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grantham v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- G. E. M., Inc. v. Plough, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- De Maio v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Gibraltar Construction & Engineering, Inc. v. State National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Katz v. Simcha Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- S.A.S. Personnel Consultants, Inc. v. Pat-Pan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. David & Dash, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1977
- J. I. Case Credit Corp. v. InsleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Premier Industrial Corporation v. NechamkinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- WAMCO XXV Ltd. v. DeSouza, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001