Smith v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Pecola Smith was convicted of battery, a Class A misdemean- or. We have restated her issues on appeal as follows:
1. Was the evidence sufficient to support conviction?
Did the trial court err in setting restitution without receiving evidence of actual loss sustained, determining Smith's ability to pay, or fixing the manner of payment?
Smith first argues that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction. On appeal, we will neither reweigh the evidence nor assess the credibility of witnesses and will review only the facts most favorable to the state.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palmer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Hoffa v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Gash v. Morgan County Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Lowdermilk, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- S.G. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kellett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Cynthia Bell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Shaffer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.