Legal Opinion

Mancino v. Santa Clara County Flood Control & Water District

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1969No. Civ. 24459PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.

In an action for “Trespass and Inverse Condemnation” against Santa Clara County Flood Control and Water District (District) and others, plaintiff Melina Mancino appeals from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, in her favor and against the District. Judgment was entered in favor of the remaining defendants who are not parties to this appeal.

The subject of the action was the construction by the District, through a contractor, of a storm drainage system which, in part, ran along Emory Street in the City of San Jose (City). Its construction and operation by the District had been expressly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Montgomery v. Santa Ana Westminster Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Cleveland v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bettis v. BettisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. City of Tiburon v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Bello v. ABA Energy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API