Legal Opinion
Irvin v. Rhodes
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 1996No. WD 52144PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FENNER, Judge.
This matter comes before us as a result of the competing motions for summary judgment filed by Budget Rent A Car of Missouri (“Budget”) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). Both parties acknowledge that there is no dispute as to the material facts of the case and that summary disposition of the case is appropriate.
The record reveals that Kenneth and Mary Ann Rhodes were insured under a State Farm automobile insurance policy covering a 1987 Cadillac that they owned. Around Christmas 1990, the insured Cadillac was stolen. The theft was reported to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Martin v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Halpin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Conway v. VillaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bowers v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Kellar v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Budget Rent a Car of St. Louis v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wentzville Park Associates, L.P. v. American Casualty Insurance Co. of ReadingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Allstate Insurance v. Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.