Legal Opinion
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY v. Kay
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1971No. 12300PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff insurer initiated this .declaratory judgment action to determine its liability and duty to afford a defense to its insured, Myrtle L. Kay, under an automobile liability policy.
On August 4, 1968, Myrtle L. Kay, while operating her automobile, either fell asleep or suffered a blackout, and ran her vehicle off the highway and into a dirt embankment. She and her passenger, Richard Kay, sustained severe injuries in this accident. Richard Kay, single, age 35 years, is the son of Myrtle L. Kay and has resided with her for the past eleven years, since his return…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Home Indemnity Company v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Peninsula Insurance v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Stillwell v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Callahan v. American Motorists InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Diamond Service Co. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. Louis A. Roser CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Board of County Commissioners v. Guarantee InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.