Legal Opinion

Reasner v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2017No. 7171 S-15900/S-15929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lisa Reasner suffered years of sexual abuse while in foster care and after the Office of Children’s Services (OCS) 1 approved her adoption. Years later Reasner sued OCS after discovering that OCS might have played a role in allowing her abuse. The superior court concluded that Reasneris claims were untimely and granted summary judgment in favor of OCS. The superior court also concluded that even if Reasner’s claims had been timely, OCS would still be entitled to partial summary judgment on various other grounds, including that OCS was partially protected…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McCullen v. CoakleySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Miller v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. North Slope Borough and North Slope Borough School District v. State of Alaska, Department of Education and Early DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Basey v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Alaska State Troopers, Bureau of InvestigationsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API