Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance v. Paul Tishman Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff to dismiss the counterclaim of the defendant Paul Tishman Co., Inc., on the ground that as pleaded it does not on its face state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is in equity to rescind an insurance policy issued by the plaintiff to the defendants. The policy thus sought to be abrogated is not annexed to the complaint, but for the purposes of the action instituted by plaintiff is sufficiently identified.
*453Tishman’s answer, in addition to the general denial of the allegations of the complaint, asserts by way of counterclaim that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shearman v. . the Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Fowler v. . the New York Indemnity Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Crossways Apartments Corp. v. AmanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Du Pont Automobile Distributors, Inc. v. Du Pont Motors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Boiardi v. Marden, Orth & Hastings Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Friscia v. Safeguard InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
- Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. Carol Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962