Du Pont Automobile Distributors, Inc. v. Du Pont Motors, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
The defendant answered the amended complaint, setting forth two counterclaims. I think the court erred in refusing to set aside the complaint for insufficiency. It is evident from a reading *314of the complaint in question that the plaintiff is suing for breach of contract, but just what that contract is the complaint fails to state. The allegation of the complaint is: “ That heretofore and on or about the 1st day of February, 1922, the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing whereby, among other conditions, it was agreed that the plaintiff was to act as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ship v. FridenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- A. O. Andersen Trading Co. v. BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Boiardi v. Marden, Orth & Hastings Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Baby Show Exhibition Co. v. Crowell Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Brodsky v. RieserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Didier v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Anderson v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Melino v. Tougher Heating & Plumbing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Berdych v. Bell Aerospace Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Empire Plexiglass Corp. v. Enterprise Industries, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.