Legal Opinion

United States v. 9,947.71 Acres of Land, More or Less, in County of Clark, State of Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided July 19, 1963No. Civ. 29PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEIRSON M. HALL, District Judge.

The question to be resolved is whether or not defendants, Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (Fibreboard), and Stauffer Chemical Co. (Stauffer) had a compensable property interest in a certain road at the time the United States filed its suit in condemnation and secured an order for possession, which was October 12 and 13, 1952, hereafter referred to as the date of “taking”. The land taken in condemnation is and has been known as “Lake Mead Base”, a military installation. ,¡

This memorandum is based on a stipulation of facts, and a supplemental stipulation of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Girves v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Humboldt County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Sierra Club v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
  5. Humboldt County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API