In Re Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON OBJECTIONS TO CLAIMS
ADLAI S. HARDIN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue before the Court is whether a claim may be disallowed on the ground that it violates the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 251 et seq. (the “FTA”), in particular 47 U.S.C. § 253(a). The claim in question is based on a 5% ’’franchise fee” (alternatively referred to as “rent” or a claim based on quantum meruit) which, together with other local franchise requirements, is imposed by a county on all telecommunications service providers except for the incumbent provider. Under the analysis of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Tcg Detroit, (98-2034), (98-2035) v. City of Dearborn, (98-2034),third-Party (98-2035), Ameritech Michigan, Incorporated, Third-Party (98-2035)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- The City of Rome, New York v. Verizon Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- New Jersey Payphone Association, Inc, a Not for Profit Corporation Organized Under the Laws of New Jersey v. Town of West New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dakota Systems, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Montgomery County Maryland v. Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In re Best Payphones, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007