Maryland Casualty Co. v. Williams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The purpose of the bill is to follow alleged trust funds and reclaim them for the benefit of the party alleged to be equitably entitled thereto. The appeal is from a decree sustaining demurrers to the bill as amended.
The controlling facts averred in the bill are briefly these:
In September, 1931, the Bank of Tuskegee, a state banking corporation, having acquired charter power to operate a trust department, act as guardian, etc., under Code, § 6388, was appointed guardian of the estate of Mamie Donald and others, minors. The Maryland Casualty Company became surety on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Little v. ChadwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Bank of Florence v. United States Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Robinson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- First Nat. Bank of Opp v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Screws v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Gordon v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Gordon v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Russell v. First Nat. Bank of HartselleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Southland Inv. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939