Legal Opinion

Beckett v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1941No. 25985. Judgments reversedPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The plaintiff, Phyllis Beckett, filed a complaint in the superior court of Cook county against the defendant, the F. W. Woolworth Co., seeking damages for breach of an express warranty alleged to have been made by the defendant incident to the sale to her of a cosmetic or toilet preparation known as “Pinaud’s '612’ Creamy Mascara.” Plaintiff charged that the defendant warranted this preparation was pure, harmless, free from any poisonous substance or germs, and that it was fit and proper for the purpose of coloring and blackening her eyelashes. Answering, the defendant denied the material…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rotche v. Buick Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. MacAndrews & Forbes Co. v. Mechanical Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Peoria Grape Sugar Co. v. TurneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Beckett v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Paul Harris Furniture Co. v. MorseIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Collins Co. v. Carboline Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Dregne v. Five Cent Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Weiss v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Stamm v. Wilder Travel TrailersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API