Beckett v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hebel
This is an action for damages for an eye injury which the plaintiff claims was caused by poisonous and harmful substances contained in a tube of “Pinaud’s Six-Twelve Creamy Mascara, ’ ’ purchased by her from the retailer, F. W. Woolworth Company, the defendant. The manufacturer of the article is not a party to this action. The cause was submitted to a jury who rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff and assessed the damages at $11,250.
At the close of the plaintiff’s case and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant filed motions for directed verdicts; both motions were denied. After…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wiedeman v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Geithman v. EichlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- MacAndrews & Forbes Co. v. Mechanical Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Sloan v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
- Hobart v. YoungSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beckett v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941