Legal Opinion

Claeson v. Hennessey

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 5, 1959No. Gen. 10,160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE REYNOLDS

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiffs Carl W. Claeson and Ruth Claeson, husband and wife sued Gilbert H. Hennessey for $7620 claiming a breach of a written contract entered into by the parties on the 5th day of May 1956. The defendant Gilbert H. Hennessey was engaged in the florist business in Springfield, Illinois under the name of Hennessey Florist and had been in business some forty years. In the March issue of the “Florist’s Review,” a florist trade journal, the defendant advertised under “Help Wanted” for a man to work in greenhouse work and to get into the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Underground Construction Co. v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'n v. WeidenmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Dikeman v. Sunday Creek Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Doherty v. Schipper & BlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Keel v. Illinois Terminal RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. LustigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Schwarze v. Solo Cup Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Rankin v. HojkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Livers v. WuDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API