Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Chicago, Great Western Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided January 30, 1943No. Civil Action No. 348PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
After trial to the court with a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff, within the period of ten days from the entry of judgment, filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court a written motion for a new trial, which has never been served. The defendant thereafter moved to strike the motion for a new trial on the ground that it was not served within the requirement of Rule 59(b), F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The court required that, at a single hearing, arguments be presented upon the motion to strike, and (upon the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Clarence J. MatyaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Albano v. Bonanza International Development Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- John E. Smith's Sons Co. v. Lattimer Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pamela Sue Rulo Sadowski v. Bombardier LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Robert Glenmore Simmons and Gladyce W. Simmons v. Continental Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.