Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hillers v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 6, 1951No. 32335Published

1DissentDavison, J.

I concur in the pronouncement of law contained in the first syllabus, and the reasoning in support thereof in the body, of the opinion of the majority of the court. However, I disagree with, and dissent to, the remainder of the opinion and the conclusion reached thereby, and think that I should express my views.

Reduced to a very condensed statement, the determinative facts and dates in this case are these:

Decedent, while the owner of the building and loan stock, died September 2, 1930;

Final account of his administrator was approved and order of distribution entered September 25, 1931;

Stock…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Purcell Bank & Trust Co. of Purcell v. ByarsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Johnston v. KeeferIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Rork ex rel. Warner v. Board of Commissioners of Douglas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API