Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Linsenmeyer
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1959No. 6502PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Chief Justice.
The present action was commenced by the duly appointed executors of the lessor of certain premises, against the City of Phoenix, lessee. The executors allege that certain “sewer and water connections” became the property of the lessor upon termination of the lease, and that their subsequent sale and removal constituted conversion against the estate.
In 1946 the City of Phoenix undertook to build and operate an “Emergency Veteran’s Housing Project”. Pre-fabricated housing units were acquired from the Federal Government. The City sought suitable land upon which to erect…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brutinel v. NygrenArizona Supreme Court · 1916
- City of Phoenix v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Kaye v. SmithermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- City of Yuma v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Phoenix v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. MascariCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Civic Auditorium & Convention Center Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Phoenix Western Holding Corporation v. GleesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Hegel v. O'Malley Ins. Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.