Lowe's Charlotte Hardware, Inc. v. Howard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendants contend “ [t] he decision of the Superior Court to set aside the original judgment was based on findings of fact not supported by the evidence, and by the refusal to find facts' supported by competent, uncontradicted evidence.”
Findings of fact made by a trial court, if supported by any competent evidence, are binding on appeal even though there is evidence to the contrary. Cogdill v. Highway Comm. and Westfeldt v. Highway Comm., 279 N.C. 313, 182 S.E. 2d 373 (1971) ; Kirby v. Contracting Co., 11 N.C. App. 128, 180 S.E. 2d 407 (1971), cert. denied 278 N.C. 701 (1971).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Brady v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Kirby v. ASHEVILLE CONTRACTING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Tyson v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
- Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3Cited by1 opinion
- Windley v. DockeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989