Legal Opinion

Windley v. Dockery

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1989No. 8927DC216PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

The only question raised on this appeal is whether Judge Carpenter erred in entering the order dated 14 November 1988 denying defendants’ Rule 60 motion. G.S. 7A-228(c) provides:

Whenever [an appeal from a magistrate] is docketed and is regularly set for trial, and the appellant fails to appear and prosecute his appeal, the presiding judge may have the appellant called and the appeal dismissed; and in such case the judgment of the magistrate shall be affirmed.

The question before us is whether Judge Carpenter erred in denying defendants’ motion to obtain relief from that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. York v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Lowe's Charlotte Hardware, Inc. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Milton M. Croom Charitable Remainder Unitrust v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API