Legal Opinion

Billings v. Finn

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1921No. Civ. No. 3989PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ' of Mandate to compel a sale of property Under "execution. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate directing the respondent, Thomas Finn, as sheriff, to sell certain property in accordance with the instructions of petitioners.

The facts upon which the petition is based may be briefly summarized as follows: The petitioners herein in 1916 commenced an action against John Fauser and John Doe, alleging such persons to be “copartners doing business under the firm name of John Fauser & Co.” The action was brought upon a bond' executed in the name of John Fauser & Co. Judgment was rendered against “John Fauser and John Doe, copartners doing business…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davidson v. KnoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Palmer v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Craig v. San Fernando Furniture Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Thompson v. Palmer CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Potts v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Steele v. WardwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API