Legal Opinion

Neusted v. Skernswell

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1945No. Civ. 12494PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

action was one seeking to establish a trust for plaintiff in an undivided one-half interest in a parcel of real property in San Francisco, for an accounting of the income therefrom, and for a partition and sale thereof. An interlocutory decree was entered adjudging plaintiff and defendant Skernswell to be each the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the property, subject to a mortgage lien, appointing a referee to take an accounting, appointing the same person receiver to take charge of the property and sole referee in partition and directing him to sell the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Knapp v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. McCarthy v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Martin v. KehlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Stone v. LobsienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API