Neusted v. Skernswell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
action was one seeking to establish a trust for plaintiff in an undivided one-half interest in a parcel of real property in San Francisco, for an accounting of the income therefrom, and for a partition and sale thereof. An interlocutory decree was entered adjudging plaintiff and defendant Skernswell to be each the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the property, subject to a mortgage lien, appointing a referee to take an accounting, appointing the same person receiver to take charge of the property and sole referee in partition and directing him to sell the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Knapp v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- McCarthy v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Martin v. KehlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Stone v. LobsienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.