Hayes-Thomas Grain Co. v. A. F. Wilcox Contracting Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; John E. Martineau, Chancellor ; 1. As to the liability of the Vinsant Company, the matter is settled by the case of 93 S. W. 427. The contract was one of partnership, lb.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; John E. Martineau, Chancellor ; 1. As to the liability of the Vinsant Company, the matter is settled by the case of 93 S. W. 427. The contract was one of partnership, lb. It was a joint enterprise with a division of profits and clearly a partnership. 211 S. W. 148; 93 Id. 427; 80 Ark. 23; 87 Id. 412; 63 Id. 518; 44 Id. 427; 145 U. S. 611; 64 S. W. 1007; 9 Leigh 424; 45 S. E. 371; 22 N. W. 809; 89 Fed. 140; 48 S. W. 548. The Vinsant Company was clearly liable. 93 Ark. 346; 107 Id. 118; 46 Id. 132; 49 Id. 457; 121 Id. 705-711. It was not only a partner…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
Appellee A. F. Wilcox Contracting Company, a foreign corporation domiciled at Kansas City, Missouri, entered into a contract with a street improvement district in Little Rock to construct the improvement authorized by the organization of the district. Appellees J. R. Yansant and A. J. Rector are copartners doing business under the trade name of J. R. Yansant Construction Company, and they entered into a contract with appellee A. F. Wilcox Contracting Company (hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Company) which recited the contract between the Contracting Company and the improvement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roach v. RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Missouri & North Arkansas Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Mehaffy v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Sallee v. Bank of CorningSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stone v. RiggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- C. A. Rees & Co. v. PaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Henslee v. MobleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921