Elliott v. Callan
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentDenecke, J.
I dissent from that part of the decision which holds that the testimony of customary speeds was erroneously admitted.
The basis for my dissent is a disagreement with the majority on the reason why evidence of a custom or practice of any kind is admissible and a disagreement on the effect of the statute providing for designated speeds.
The majority considers the evidence incompetent because it did not point “to anything he [defendant] did in the particular circumstances * * * but by drawing an inference from the conduct of others * * *” seeks to explain why defendant’s speed was reasonable.
*263Eviden…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Burrows v. NashOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Thelen v. SpilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Millar v. SemlerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Hise v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.