Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elliott v. Callan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1970Published

1DissentDenecke, J.

I dissent from that part of the decision which holds that the testimony of customary speeds was erroneously admitted.

The basis for my dissent is a disagreement with the majority on the reason why evidence of a custom or practice of any kind is admissible and a disagreement on the effect of the statute providing for designated speeds.

The majority considers the evidence incompetent because it did not point “to anything he [defendant] did in the particular circumstances * * * but by drawing an inference from the conduct of others * * *” seeks to explain why defendant’s speed was reasonable.

*263Eviden…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Burrows v. NashOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Thelen v. SpilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Millar v. SemlerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hise v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API