Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fierst

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 282PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

Appellee was charged with criminal attempt 1 to commit theft. He pleaded not guilty and waived jury trial. At the close of the Commonwealth’s case, the lower court sustained appellee’s demurrer to the evidence, and the Commonwealth has appealed. 2

The lower court stated that its reason for sustaining the demurrer was that the information filed against appellee was incomplete in that it did not contain “a plain and concise statement of the essential elements of the offense substantially the same as or cognate to the offense alleged in the complaint . . ..” Pa.R.Crim.P. 225(b)(5).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. WheelerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. DeyellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. BryantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Culbreth v. Lawrence J. Miller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. Lauer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API