Commonwealth v. Mills
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence. The appellant, Richard Mills, was found guilty after a jury trial of criminal attempt 1 and criminal conspiracy. 2 Both charges arose out of an incident wherein appellant and his co-defendant, William J. Gola, allegedly made efforts to procure a controlled substance (methamphetamine) for an undercover agent from the Bureau of Narcotics Investigation. Boilerplate post-verdict motions were filed by the appellant but denied by the trial court. On February 24, 1983, the trial court imposed a sentence of five (5) years special…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ChanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. FelicianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- United States v. Dorian DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.