Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mills

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1984No. 741PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence. The appellant, Richard Mills, was found guilty after a jury trial of criminal attempt 1 and criminal conspiracy. 2 Both charges arose out of an incident wherein appellant and his co-defendant, William J. Gola, allegedly made efforts to procure a controlled substance (methamphetamine) for an undercover agent from the Bureau of Narcotics Investigation. Boilerplate post-verdict motions were filed by the appellant but denied by the trial court. On February 24, 1983, the trial court imposed a sentence of five (5) years special…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. ChanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. FelicianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. MossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. United States v. Dorian DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API