City of Cookeville v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we affirm the federal district court’s resolution of a dispute over one element of the compensation that Tennessee law requires when a city annexes territory and exercises its right to purchase electric utility property within the annexed territory. The federal court had jurisdiction because a federal agency, the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”), was a party defendant. We reverse, however, a post-judgment order enjoining the city from providing electric service in this annexed area pending resolution of the compensation dispute.
When a Tennessee…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Cookeville, Tennessee v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Jax Leasing, LLC v. RuanUnited States Circuit Court · 2019
- Jax Leasing, LLC v. RuanDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019