Legal Opinion

City of Cookeville v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 19, 2007No. 05-5886, 06-5363PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

In this case, we affirm the federal district court’s resolution of a dispute over one element of the compensation that Tennessee law requires when a city annexes territory and exercises its right to purchase electric utility property within the annexed territory. The federal court had jurisdiction because a federal agency, the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”), was a party defendant. We reverse, however, a post-judgment order enjoining the city from providing electric service in this annexed area pending resolution of the compensation dispute.

When a Tennessee…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Cookeville, Tennessee v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Jax Leasing, LLC v. RuanUnited States Circuit Court · 2019
  3. Jax Leasing, LLC v. RuanDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API