Legal Opinion
Fox v. Swartz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 1949No. 34,787PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial after the court had granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. 2 He was an employe of defendant Freda Swartz, d. b. a. The Flame, located in Minneapolis. He brought this suit against her and her surety, under M. S. A. 340.95, the civil damages section of our liquor control act, for injuries suffered when defendant’s manager, in a drunken condition, assaulted him.
From the pleadings, it appears that plaintiff has twice previously sought relief for the same injury. First, he sued Freda Swartz…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Shanahan v. . Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Tipton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Adamson v. DoughertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Corcoran v. PG Corcoran Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.