Legal Opinion
Alcaraz v. KMF Oakland LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 12, 2020No. 3:18-cv-02801-SIUnknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BERNARDO ALCARAZ, Case No. 18-cv-02801-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 9 v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DENYING 10 KMF OAKLAND LLC, et al., DEFENDANT ALTEZZA'S MOTION TO DISMISS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 44, 76, 90 12 13 14 Before the Court are plaintiff Bernardo Alcaraz’s motion for preliminary injunction and 15 defendant Altezza Condo LLC’s motion to dismiss the third amended complaint. Dkt. Nos. 76, 90.1 16 The motions came on for telephonic hearing on June 11, 2020. 17 Having considered…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.