Legal Opinion
People v. Burgio
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 1993No. B063231PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
The court, sitting without a jury, found defendant1 guilty of manufacturing methamphetamine (count I), conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine (count II), possession of methamphetamine for purposes of sale (count III) and conspiracy to possess methamphetamine for sale (count IV); and found true special allegations, as to counts I and II, that the substance containing methamphetamine exceeded 25 gallons of liquid by *772volume within the meaning of Health and Safety Code2 section 11379.8, subdivision (a); and, as to counts III and IV, that the substance containing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turner v. Association of American Medical CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Dean Ashworth v. Eddie R. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- People v. BurgioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.