People v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARTIN, Acting P. J.
Defendant was charged by amended information as follows: counts I and II—separate incidents of forcible rape (Pen. Code, §261, subd. (a)(2)) 1 and count III—attempted forcible oral copulation (§§ 288a, subd. (c), 664). It was further alleged as to each count that defendant had been convicted of and served prison terms for two prior sex offenses (§ 667.6, subd. (b)) and had been convicted of two prior serious felonies (§ 667, subd. (a)). The information also alleged the offenses charged in counts I and II were serious felonies (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(3)).
On October 19,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. PensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. KarsaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. Ramon A.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. EckardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. EspinosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026