Legal Opinion

Tartar v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1923No. L. A. No. 7516PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

Petitioner seeks an annulment of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission upon the ground that there is no evidence to sustain the findings upon which the Commission based its decision that the applicant was entitled to recover. The return of the Commission discloses that support for the award rests solely upon disputable inferences arising from facts of a circumstantial nature, the weight of which petitioner contends was overcome by positive and uncontradicted evidence. It is well settled that the findings of the Industrial Accident Commission upon questions of fact are conclusive, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Clapp's Parking Station v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Dearborn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Western Indemnity Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Newton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Singlaub v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Ragos v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API