Legal Opinion

Moses v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1925No. 15402PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

-Opinion by

RUTH, C.

Plaintiffs’ petition alleges three causes of action; - The first cause of action is for rental of a granary, nine feet high and -twelve feet in diameter, but as this first cause of action was settled or adjusted the cause is before this court ota- the. second and third catases of action wherein it is" alleged defendant agreed to return the granary in the same condition as when he-received"it. That defendant,after hauling the granary to his farm, failed to -anchor the same or put “ballast”- in It, . and the granary was destroyed by a storm and defendant has not returned it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. BoushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. Pruitt McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. McKinney v. BiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. McGraw v. HildebrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cushing Refining & Gasoline Co. v. DeshanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Western States Oil & Land Co. v. HelmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Looney v. County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Oklahoma State Bank of OcheLata v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Oklahoma Railway Co. v. MountSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API