Legal Opinion

Skelly Oil Co. v. Pruitt McCrory

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1923No. 12514PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'opinion by

STEPHENSON, O.-

In.the trial of this cause the jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs. The defendant brings error and seeks reversal principally on the ground of insufficiency of the testimony to support the verdict of the jury. The defendant seiit B. Y. Emory, one of its employes, to Carter county to prepare a lease for the drilling ;of-u well. It appears that the defendant instructed ’’the Agent to ilit'erihew á‘"mán By the name of Wallace, who owned a léase -in-the vicinity of the holdings of the defendant, for tie purpose ' of ascertaining what ’• the lóase could he purchased…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. the Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ArbogastWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. R. v. Smith Supply Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Moses v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Ritter v. PlumbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API