Days Inn of America, Inc. v. Patel
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.
Who wants to stay in a dirty motel room?
Days Inns believed that no one would and also believed that Defendant breached the franchise agreement by not keeping his facility up to snuff.
Defendant argues that he was relieved of his obligations under the franchise agreement because the road leading to his facility from the interstate was closed for a period of time by the Illinois Department of Transportation.
However, under New Jersey law, a bridge’s closure does not absolve Defendant of his duty to keep his motel rooms clean.
Motion for summary judgment allowed.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- General Linen Services, Inc. v. SmirnioudisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Days Inns Worldwide v. Mandir, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2005