Legal Opinion

Days Inns Worldwide v. Mandir, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 18, 2005No. CIV-02-1679-MPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILES-LAGRANGE, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Days Inns Worldwide’s (“DIW”) Motion for Summary Judgment. The only remaining Defendant, Jayesh N. Patel, has not filed a response. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that DIW’s Motion should be granted in part and denied in part.

1. Background

The following facts are undisputed. See Reed v. Bennett, 312 F.3d 1190, 1195 (10th Cir.2002) (holding that in the case of a party who fails to respond to a motion for summary judgment, “[t]he court should accept as true all material facts asserted and properly…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Action S.A. And Deltamar Establishment v. Marc Rich & Co., Inc. And Marc Rich, Marc RichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Reed v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Jenkins v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barrie School v. PatchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Barrie School v. PatchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Myers v. BhullarDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API