Legal Opinion

National Federation of Federal Employees v. Carlucci

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 1, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-0681, 87-1797 and 87-2350PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.

Two unions seek to enjoin compulsory random urinalysis drug testing of certain civilian employees of the Department of the Army. These consolidated actions are before the Court on plaintiffs' application for an expanded preliminary injunction and defendants’ motion for summary judgment. As an employer, the government has a compelling safety interest, in some instances, in maintaining a drug-free workplace; it has not demonstrated, however, that urinalysis drug testing is capable of showing whether an individual is impaired by drugs or under…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. National Federation of Federal Employees v. CheneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Klayman v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Bangert v. HodelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
  5. Hartness v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API