Wasserman v. Metzger
Supreme Court of Virginia
■Appeal from a decree of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Korfolk. Decree in favor of complainant. Two of the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
This is the second time this case has been to this court. Upon the former appeal the merits of the case were not considered, but it was remanded in order that the bill might be amended, bringing in a new party. 102 Va. 836, 47 S. E. 820. The material facts of the case are the same now, however, as they were then, and briefly stated are as follows:
By a deed dated December 10, 1892, Samuel Wasserman. and wife conveyed to L. B. Allen, trustee, a house and lot in. the city of Norfolk to secure to Sophia Metzger the payment of two negotiable notes for $1,250.00 each, payable one and' two years…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Lamar's Ex'or v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
- Sulphur Mines Co. v. Thompson's HeirsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Standard Oil Co. v. Wakefield's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Yancey v. MauckSupreme Court of Virginia · 1859
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parrish v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- University of Richmond v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Smith v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Wilson v. Moir (In Re Wilson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Wills v. Chesapeake Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.