Legal Opinion
McCall Bros. v. Farley Skinner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1913No. 2838PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Brror from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Action by McCall Brothers, copartners, against Farley & Skinner, copartners, and another. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
The rental contract, out of which this controversy originated, is as follows:
“Contract, made this 11th day of November, 1909, by and between T. J. Ellis, Jr., of Ochelata, Okla., party of the first part, and McCall Bros., of Vera, Okla., party of the second part, witnesseth: That the said first party agrees to furnish the said second party eighteen hundred acres of pasture in sections 26, 27, 34, 28, 32, 33, township 25, range 13. The said second party is to furnish five hundred head of cattle to be pastured on said land and agrees to pay '$2.00 per head for the pasturing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cole v. Missouri, K. & O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. JamiesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Wicker v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McBeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Reynolds v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gregory v. HarperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.