Legal Opinion
Lancaster at Fresh Meadow, Inc. v. Suderov
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel Rabin, J.
In this action involving a contract for the purchase and sale of real property, plaintiff (the original purchaser’s assignee) seeks the following relief in the alternative: specific performance, specific performance with an abatement in the purchase price, or a return of its down payment and damages.
The pertinent facts relating to the sole issue remaining in dispute between the parties (all other issues having been disposed of during the trial) are these: On or about May 9, 1955, plaintiff’s assignor and five of the defendants, through their admittedly authorized agent, defendant Max Suderov,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Imperator Realty Co. v. . TullNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Shapley v. . AbbottNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Newton v. . BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Raleigh Associates, Inc. v. HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America v. OussaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Simmons v. Westwood Apartments Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Ditmars-31' Street Development Corp. v. PuniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Ochoa v. Estate of Alberto SarriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Mashomack Fish & Game Preserve Club, Inc. v. Estate of JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Weiland v. BernsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.