Legal Opinion
Weiland v. Bernstein
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles S. Golden,
Off. Ref. This controversy arises out of a contract whereby the defendants agreed to sell nine parcels of realty to the plaintiff. The contract was entered into November 22, 1955. The parcels are contiguous and each is separately described as to location and dimensions. All the parcels combined also are described as being portions of lots 1570 to 1573, as shown on the “ Map of St. James Park, Third Division, Section B ” and filed in the Suffolk County Clerk’s office.
*737The contract obligated the seller to provide building permits for each parcel. The title was to be closed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Raleigh Associates, Inc. v. HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Siebros Finance Corp. v. FirmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Lancaster at Fresh Meadow, Inc. v. SuderovNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Hamilton Park Builders Corp. v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tubb v. Rolling Ridge, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Weiland v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961