Legal Opinion

Doss v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 31, 1996No. 2209953PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Judge.

The defendant was convicted in a bench trial of malicious wounding and use of a firearm in the commission of malicious wounding. On appeal, he contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to prove malicious wounding, and (2) the trial judge violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process and Fifth Amendment self-incrimination protections by conditioning the suspension of the penitentiary sentence upon his surrendering the handgun he used to commit the offenses, which he had testified he did not possess. We find no error and affirm the convictions and sentences.

SUFFICIENCY OF…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  3. Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Long v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  5. Branch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. Utz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  3. Moses v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  4. J.D. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  5. Arthur Amil Zebbs v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API