Legal Opinion
Arthur Amil Zebbs v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided May 17, 2016No. 0933151PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATLEE, Judge.
As a term of Ms probation for various sex crimes, Arthur Zebbs was ordered to complete sex offender treatment. This treatment required Zebbs to admit that he had committed the crimes for which he was on probation. Zebbs refused to make such an admission, and was removed from treatment as a result. Because Zebbs failed to complete the treatment, a judge of the Circuit Court for the City of Hampton (“the circuit court”) found him in violation of the terms of his probation. Zebbs now appeals that revocation, arguing that the treatment program’s requirement that he admit his past…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Westley A. AlbrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- Francisco Hernandez, s/k/a Francisco Alberto Hernandez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
- Darrin Mark Robertson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020
- Dorothy Elizabeth Cilwa v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- Francisco Hernandez, s/k/a Francisco Alberto Hernandez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.