Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1934No. Docket No. 1773Published

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of grand theft. He waived a jury and upon a trial by the court, he was convicted of the crime charged. He appeals from the final judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for new trial:

The main contention of appellant is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and we shall therefore proceed to a consideration of the evidence produced. We may state in passing that the evidence offered by defendant conflicted in many details with that offered by the prosecution. We may also state that the evidence offered by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sill v. CeschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Robinson v. Easton Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ripy v. CronanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Lone Rock Bank v. PipkinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. McLennan v. Investment Exchange Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API