Ripy v. Cronan
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE' 63. — ACTION BY MARION W. RIPY AGAINST CHARLES CRONAN. Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Brandi', Second Division1). Thos. R. Gordon, Judge. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff .appeals. POINTS AND AUTHORITIES.. 1. In, 20 Cyc. 14, under the title “Fraud,” we find this concise-statement of the law:- “The simplest and perhaps the most, frequent case of fraud is that consisting of telling a deliberate and intentional falsehood as to a material fact.
Read the full summary
CASE' 63. — ACTION BY MARION W. RIPY AGAINST CHARLES CRONAN. Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Brandi', Second Division1). Thos. R. Gordon, Judge. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff .appeals. POINTS AND AUTHORITIES.. 1. In, 20 Cyc. 14, under the title “Fraud,” we find this concise-statement of the law:- “The simplest and perhaps the most, frequent case of fraud is that consisting of telling a deliberate and intentional falsehood as to a material fact. Where a person makes such a misrepresentation, intending that another shall act upon it, 'and the latter does act upon it to…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op tbce Court by
¥m. Rogers Clay, Oommsiisoner
Affirming.
As it is admitted in the brief of counsel for appellant that tbe latter ha's abandoned' the theory that appellee Charles J. Cronan was. the agent of the Louisville school board in the^transaetion hereinafter referred to, we shall address ourselves to the sole question whether or not the second paragraph lof appellant’s petition states a cause of action. That paragraph is as follows:
“Comes the plaintiff, Marion W'. Ripy, and for a second paragraph to Ms amended petition states: That he is a resident of the city of Louisville,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parker v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Livermore v. Middlesborough Town Lands Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Chrysler v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Graffenstein v. E. Epstein & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Collier v. HarknessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hillcrest Pacific Corp. v. YamamuraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Sanford Construction Co. v. S & H CONTRACTORS, INC.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Culton v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Shuttlefield v. NeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Stevens v. ReillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.